In January 2018, Montecito, California, was the site of a catastrophic disaster that left a lasting mark on the state’s history. Just weeks after the Thomas Fire—a devastating wildfire that scorched over 280,000 acres—intense rainstorms triggered deadly mudslides in the region. Twenty-three people lost their lives, over 100 homes were destroyed, and entire neighborhoods were buried under a torrent of mud and debris. The Montecito mudslides not only reshaped the community but also spurred a wave of lawsuits that highlighted the intersection of natural disasters, infrastructure, and liability.
Now, as Los Angeles grapples with its own devastating fires in 2025-the Eaton Fire, Palisades Fire and Hurst Fire to name a few, the lessons of Montecito take on renewed urgency. With burn scars from this year’s fires spanning the hillsides of LA’s sprawling suburbs, the potential for post-fire mudslides looms large, especially with the recent rains. Understanding what happened in Montecito can help communities brace for the aftermath of this year’s fires.
Table of Contents
The Montecito mudslides were the result of a tragic chain reaction. First came the Thomas Fire, which stripped the land of vegetation—nature’s best defense against erosion. When heavy rains followed, there was nothing to anchor the soil. The water mixed with loose sediment and ash, forming fast-moving debris flows capable of destroying anything in their path.
This year, Los Angeles faces a similar scenario. The fires of 2025 have left behind vast burn scars, areas where the soil is now hydrophobic—repelling water instead of absorbing it. With the rainy season approaching, the risk of mudslides in fire-ravaged areas like Altadena, Malibu, Pacific Palisades, and Topanga Canyon is at an all-time high.
After the Montecito disaster, lawsuits emerged against Southern California Edison (SCE), whose electrical equipment was found to have sparked the Thomas Fire. Danko Meredith represented victims—including families of those killed, homeowners, and businesses. We argued that the utility’s negligence in maintaining its infrastructure contributed to the mudslide catastrophe. The lawsuits resulted in substantial settlements for our clients. SCE agreed to pay hundreds of millions to impacted residents.
With regards to the 2025 fires, utilities remain under investigation for their role in wildfire ignition. Additionally, questions about zoning, emergency preparedness, and infrastructure maintenance are likely to resurface. Could better planning have minimized the risk to hillside neighborhoods? Were warnings adequate? And most importantly, how will accountability be enforced?
The Montecito mudslides demonstrated the need for comprehensive disaster preparedness and response strategies. For communities in Los Angeles, these measures are critical:
Beyond the physical destruction, the human cost of mudslides is immeasurable. In Montecito, the loss of lives and homes was deeply felt, but the community’s resilience became a source of inspiration. Today, Los Angeles faces a similar test. The fires of 2025 have already displaced thousands, and the looming threat of mudslides compounds the trauma. Yet, through proactive measures and community solidarity, the region can emerge stronger.
As Los Angeles braces for the rainy season, Montecito’s story serves as both a cautionary tale and a roadmap. The intersection of fire, rain, and human accountability underscores the complex challenges of living in wildfire-prone areas. While we cannot control nature, we can control how we prepare, respond, and adapt.
The time to act is now. By investing in prevention and learning from the past, Los Angeles can mitigate the risk of another disaster—and honor the lessons of Montecito for years to come. If you or someone you know was impacted by the 2025 Los Angeles fires, please contact Danko Meredith and their talented attorneys to discuss your options. Their experienced team can help you navigate the complexities of disaster-related claims and ensure your voice is heard.